Maze vs UserTesting: Which User Research Tool Should You Use?

User research tools split into two categories: tools built for teams who want to run quick tests themselves, and platforms built for enterprise research organizations. Maze is the first. UserTesting is the second.

How each tool works

Maze lets you connect a Figma or Marvel prototype and build a test around it. You add tasks, questions, and success criteria. You share the test link with participants — your own recruited users, or Maze's built-in panel. Participants complete the tasks unmoderated (no facilitator, no live session), and Maze collects click maps, heatmaps, task completion rates, and time-on-task data.

UserTesting operates at a different level. It has a large participant panel, video recordings of sessions, and options for both moderated (live, with a facilitator) and unmoderated tests. It integrates with Jira, Slack, and other enterprise tools. Pricing is custom — you talk to sales, negotiate a contract, and typically pay $25,000-50,000/year or more for a team plan.

Where Maze wins

Accessibility. If you're a product designer or PM at a startup or mid-sized company, you can sign up for Maze, build a test from your Figma prototype, and have results in 48 hours. No sales call, no contract, no waiting for a procurement cycle.

The Figma integration is native and fast. You paste your prototype link, Maze pulls in your flows, and you're building tasks in minutes. It feels like a design tool, not an enterprise platform.

Pricing is transparent: $99/month for Teams, $399/month for Organizations. You know what you're paying before you talk to anyone.

The speed of iteration matters. If your team runs tests every two weeks as part of a product sprint, Maze fits that cadence. You don't need a dedicated researcher to operate it — a designer can run the test and analyze the results.

Try Maze Free

Where UserTesting wins

Scale and participant quality. UserTesting has one of the largest participant panels available — hundreds of thousands of screened testers. If you need to test with very specific demographic segments (licensed nurses in the US aged 35-50, for example), UserTesting can reach them. Maze's panel is smaller.

Moderated sessions. Maze is unmoderated-only. If you need to watch someone think out loud, ask follow-up questions in real time, and probe ambiguous behaviors, UserTesting's moderated sessions are the tool for that. No unmoderated test gives you the same depth.

Enterprise features: SSO, advanced access controls, compliance certifications, and dedicated customer success. For large organizations with strict procurement requirements, this matters.

The team size factor

The honest version of this comparison: Maze is for teams who are doing research but don't have a dedicated research budget. UserTesting is for teams with a dedicated research function and enterprise budget.

If you're a 20-person startup running biweekly product sprints, Maze at $99-399/month is the right choice. If you're a Fortune 500 company with a research team that runs 100+ studies per year, UserTesting's platform is built for your scale.

Try UserTesting

Pricing

Maze: Free for 1 study/month. Teams plan is $99/month. Organizations plan is $399/month.

UserTesting: Custom pricing. Enterprise plans typically start at $25,000/year. No self-serve option.

Who should use which

Use Maze if:

• You're a designer or PM who wants to run tests independently
• Your budget is $100-400/month
• You want fast, unmoderated feedback on Figma prototypes

Use UserTesting if:

• You have a dedicated research team and enterprise budget
• You need moderated sessions with think-aloud protocols
• You need access to a large, diverse, and screened participant panel

Start Testing with Maze