Hotjar vs Maze: Different Tools, Different Questions

You'll see Hotjar and Maze compared because they're both "user research tools" and they both cost roughly $100-400/month. But they answer completely different questions. Picking one over the other isn't really a trade-off — it's about which question matters more to you right now.

The question each tool answers

Hotjar answers: How are real users behaving on your live product right now?

It gives you heatmaps showing where people click, tap, and scroll. Session recordings let you watch real user journeys — you can see exactly where someone got stuck and left. Feedback surveys can pop up after specific interactions. Funnel analysis shows where users drop off in a conversion flow.

Everything Hotjar shows you is based on real user behavior on your actual, live product.

Maze answers: Will users be able to complete this task on the thing we're about to build?

You connect a Figma prototype to Maze, write task scenarios, and send the test to participants. They click through the prototype, Maze records where they clicked, how long it took, and whether they succeeded. The results show you usability problems before the feature ships.

Why most teams need Hotjar more

Most product teams have a live product generating real user behavior right now. That's actionable data: specific pages with high drop-off, specific buttons nobody clicks, form fields where people stop filling in. Hotjar puts that data in front of you.

The insight density is high. A single Hotjar heatmap on your checkout page might reveal a button that 80% of users miss because it's below the fold on mobile. That finding leads directly to a fix you can ship this week.

Maze is more valuable if you're running frequent design tests before shipping. But many teams ship fast and iterate based on live data — they don't have a structured prototype-testing process before every feature. For those teams, Hotjar is the more practical investment.

Try Hotjar Free

Where Maze is the better choice

Pre-launch testing. If your product is complex — enterprise software, multi-step flows, healthcare — shipping a usability problem can be expensive to fix after launch. Maze's prototype testing lets you find those problems before any code ships. The cost of a Maze test is far lower than the cost of a bad launch.

Maze is also better if your team uses research structurally — if you run a test before every significant design decision, Maze fits that workflow. The Figma integration makes it fast: paste your prototype link, build tasks, share the link with your test panel.

Design teams at companies where research is part of the process (not just an afterthought) will find Maze more useful day-to-day than Hotjar.

Can you use both?

Yes, and they complement each other well. Hotjar on your live product tells you where users struggle today. Maze on your Figma prototype tells you whether your redesign will fix it. Together, they close the loop between observation and validation.

If budget forces a choice, Hotjar gives you signal on a real product, which is typically more immediately actionable than prototype testing.

Try Maze Free

Pricing

Hotjar: Free for up to 35 daily sessions. Plus plan is $32/month. Business is $80/month.

Maze: Free for 1 study/month. Teams plan is $99/month. Organizations plan is $399/month.

Hotjar's free tier is generous enough to get real value from. You can put Hotjar on a live site today, for free, and have heatmap data by tomorrow.

Who should use which

Use Hotjar if:

• You have a live product with real users
• You want to understand current user behavior without running formal studies
• Your team iterates based on live-product data

Use Maze if:

• You test prototypes before shipping
• Your team has a structured research process integrated into sprints
• You're building complex flows where pre-launch usability testing reduces risk

Install Hotjar Free