UIGuides

Supernova vs Zeroheight: Zeroheight Is Easier to Get Running

3 min readUpdated Mar 2026

Both document design systems. Zeroheight is more mature and has tighter Figma integration. Supernova has more automation but a steeper setup.

Supernova and Zeroheight both exist to solve the same problem: getting your design system documented and usable by everyone. The difference is how they get there. Zeroheight keeps it simple with strong Figma integration. Supernova adds more automation but demands more setup time.

Zeroheight wins for most teams.

Our Pick
ZeroheightZeroheight

Zeroheight is more mature, easier to set up, and has better Figma integration for most teams

What Supernova does well

Supernova's automation is its standout feature. It can pull design tokens directly from Figma, transform them into code variables for any platform (CSS, iOS, Android), and keep everything in sync automatically. The token pipeline is genuinely powerful for large organizations managing design tokens across multiple codebases.

The documentation generator can auto-create pages from your Figma components. You connect your Figma library, map your components, and Supernova builds a documentation site with props, variants, and usage examples. For teams with hundreds of components, this automation saves real time.

Supernova also supports custom exporters. If your engineering team needs tokens in a specific format or delivered to a specific repo, you can build pipelines that handle it.

Feature
SupernovaSupernova
ZeroheightZeroheight
PricingFree$149/month
Free plan
Yes
No
Platformswebweb
Real-time collaboration✓ Yes✓ Yes
PrototypingNoNo
Design systems✓ Yes✓ Yes
Auto LayoutNoNo
PluginsNoNo
Dev Mode / HandoffNoNo
Version history✓ Yes✓ Yes
Offline modeNoNo
Code export✓ YesNo
AI featuresNoNo
Try Supernova →Try Zeroheight →

Where Supernova hits limits

All that automation comes with complexity. Setting up Supernova properly takes days, not hours. The token mapping, exporter configuration, and documentation structure require someone who understands both the design system and the tool deeply. For smaller teams, that upfront cost is hard to justify.

Zeroheight takes the opposite approach. You connect Figma, embed your component frames, write documentation around them, and publish. The Figma integration is seamless. Styles, components, and frames stay synced without elaborate configuration. Your documentation looks polished immediately.

Zeroheight is also more mature. It has been around longer, has more templates, and the community has produced extensive guides. When something goes wrong, you will find answers. Supernova's documentation and community are thinner.

The editing experience in Zeroheight is straightforward. It feels like writing in Notion with Figma embeds. Non-technical team members can contribute without training. Supernova's editor is more structured, which helps with consistency but adds friction for casual contributors.

Try Zeroheight

Pricing

Supernova: Free tier. Enterprise pricing is custom (no published mid-tier).

Zeroheight: Starter at $149/mo. Growth at $399/mo. Enterprise is custom.

Supernova's free tier is generous for small teams. But scaling up means jumping to enterprise pricing with no transparent middle ground. Zeroheight's pricing is higher upfront but predictable. You know exactly what you pay at each tier.

The honest split

Supernova is right for:

  • Large organizations with complex token pipelines
  • Teams that need automated code export across platforms
  • Design systems with hundreds of components needing auto-documentation

Zeroheight is right for:

  • Teams that want to document and publish quickly
  • Figma-first workflows where tight integration matters
  • Organizations where non-designers contribute to documentation

What's good

    What's not

      Document Your Design System with Zeroheight