UIGuides

Squarespace vs Framer: Framer Is the Designer's Choice

3 min readUpdated Mar 2026

Squarespace wins on simplicity and e-commerce. Framer wins on animation, design control, and everything else designers care about.

Squarespace is the website builder your parents use. Framer is the website builder designers use. That is not a knock on Squarespace. It is excellent at getting simple sites online fast. But if you care about how your site looks, moves, and feels, Framer is in a different league.

Framer wins.

Our Pick
FramerFramer

Framer offers far superior animation tools, design control, and performance for design-driven websites

What Squarespace does well

Squarespace nails the basics. Pick a template, add your text and images, connect your domain, publish. You can have a professional-looking site live in an afternoon without any design or technical skills. The templates are tasteful and the editing experience is genuinely beginner-friendly.

E-commerce is Squarespace's other strength. Product pages, inventory tracking, checkout, shipping labels, tax calculations. It handles the full commerce stack in one subscription. Framer has no native e-commerce at all.

For service businesses, restaurants, photographers, and anyone who needs a clean online presence without ongoing maintenance, Squarespace delivers exactly what they need.

Feature
SquarespaceSquarespace
FramerFramer
Pricing$16/monthFree
Free planNo
Yes
Platformswebweb, mac
Real-time collaborationNo✓ Yes
PrototypingNo✓ Yes
Design systemsNo✓ Yes
Auto LayoutNo✓ Yes
Plugins✓ YesNo
Dev Mode / HandoffNoNo
Version history✓ Yes✓ Yes
Offline modeNoNo
Code exportNo✓ Yes
AI features✓ Yes✓ Yes
Try Squarespace →Try Framer →

Where Squarespace hits limits

Squarespace sites look like Squarespace sites. You can customize colors, fonts, and images, but the underlying layout structures are templated. If you want a layout that the template does not offer, you are stuck.

Framer obliterates this constraint. Its canvas is freeform. You place elements wherever you want, nest them in layout containers, and control every property visually. It feels closer to Figma than to a website builder. If you can design it, you can build it.

The animation capabilities are the biggest gap. Framer handles scroll-triggered animations, page transitions, micro-interactions, and spring physics natively. You build these in a visual timeline, not by writing code. Squarespace offers "fade in on scroll" and a handful of presets. That is it.

Framer sites are also fast. They generate static pages by default, which means near-instant load times. Squarespace sites carry more overhead and tend to score lower on Core Web Vitals.

The component system in Framer lets you build reusable elements with variants and props, similar to a design tool. You can create a button component once and reuse it across every page with consistent styling. Squarespace has global styles but nothing close to this level of component thinking.

Try Framer Free

Pricing

Squarespace: Personal at $16/mo. Business at $23/mo. Commerce Basic at $27/mo. Commerce Advanced at $49/mo.

Framer: Free tier. Mini at $5/mo. Basic at $15/mo. Pro at $30/mo.

Framer's free tier and $5 Mini plan make it cheaper to start. Squarespace requires at least $16/mo. At the higher tiers, pricing is similar. Squarespace's Commerce plans include features that Framer simply does not have, so the comparison breaks down if you need a full online store.

The honest split

Squarespace is right for:

  • Small businesses that need e-commerce built in
  • Non-designers who want a polished site with zero learning curve
  • Service businesses that need a simple online presence

Framer is right for:

  • Designers building portfolio sites or agency sites
  • Marketing pages that need custom animations and interactions
  • Anyone who wants their site to feel designed, not templated

What's good

    What's not

      Start Building with Framer